OK, I was wrong. But did you have to be so nasty about it?
A couple of weeks ago, I made the mistake of engaging in a comments-section discussion in the Guardian online. The topic was the world’s overpopulation and I threw in my, under-informed, two cents worth. I had forgotten that the online comments community can be really mean. I had also forgotten that Guardian readers can be a bit smug and condescending sometimes. It’s a common characteristic among people who a quite sure they are right.
As a former teacher, I prefer to take the teacherly approach to information. I usually assume that people will draw wiser conclusions when they have more knowledge, and I like it when people treat me the same way. Unfortunately, online comments sections don’t lend themselves to this kind of courtesy. Instead they rapidly devolve to ad hominem insults and name-calling.
In this particular discussion I was called stupid, ignorant, and a troll. I don’t think I am any of those things, but on this topic I was coming from a very different viewpoint than many of the other commenters who expressed dismay and disgust at my perceptions. The topic of population clearly takes on a very different hue for those living in an English city than it does for those of us living in the prairies of North America.
I had, naively, tried to point out that when I drive through Canada and the United States, I can travel many hundreds of miles without seeing many buildings or people. I posited the notion that there is enough land for everyone and that, with appropriate production and distribution processes, we could feed everyone. What I failed to include in my comment was my awareness that we, in developed countries, are collectively over-consuming and polluting. I think that’s what caused the blowback.
It wasn’t what I said so much as what I didn’t say that caused me to be vilified. Even so, someone made a comment about overprivileged Americans viewing the world from a train, which is a big leap from what I actually wrote. When a reader ascribes to me words that I didn’t write, and commenters presume an ignorance that I don’t possess, then the hoard just piles on. One or two people kindly gave me the benefit of the doubt, but they were in the minority.
Overpopulation is, indeed, a growing concern. Principally, we should worry about climate change and limited supplies of water, and I hope that education and new technologies can help to address those issues. I also hope that teaching people about overpopulation, as well as about family planning and birth control, can mitigate the problem in countries where population growth is most problematic.
All of the proposed solutions, however, require access to information, the education of women, and the empowerment of women. Perhaps we should begin by explaining that to Guardian commenters. Mocking and insulting people whom you believe to be wrong is a terrible way to teach.