David Andrews, aka @davetheaxe, is angry. He is very frustrated because we don’t all know how to use traffic circles in Edmonton. He wants someone, anyone, to put up signs explaining how they should be used correctly, and he said so on #yegtraffic, the Twitter stream dedicated to angry Edmonton drivers.
Yo #YEG #yegtraffic put great big signs at #Trafficircles explains how to f***ing use them,#insidelanehastherightofway#outsidefirstexit
I understand his frustration because he has clearly studied this issue and makes sure that he always uses traffic circles correctly. As a relative newcomer to Edmonton, though, I see the problem somewhat differently.
The first dilemma for the uninitiated is in knowing whether you are approaching a traffic circle or a roundabout. Yes, folks, there is a difference. If you didn’t know better you would think they both looked the same. That’s why @davetheaxe has an advantage over the rest of us. He knows which is which. This is important because sometimes you have to change lanes before entering the intersection, and sometimes you don’t. If it is a traffic circle and you are going straight or turning left, you enter the left lane. If it is a roundabout, you can stay in the right lane if that is where you find yourself, and exit wherever you need to.
In addition, you can change lanes within a traffic circle, but you can’t change lanes within a roundabout. See if you can guess which one causes more accidents.
The second point of confusion is which of these lanes you think is the inside lane. If you are familiar with horse racing, then you will consider the lane closest to the circle the inside lane. If, on the other hand, you were taught to drive in England (as I was) then you will consider the lane closest to the curb the inside lane. That’s where slower drivers prefer to dwell, and those who want to pass them can do so in the outside lane, next to the median. Except in the US and apparently also Canada, the inside lane is the outside lane and vice versa.
The Alberta Transportation website calls the roundabout “modern,” but I doubt that anyone in England would consider roundabouts modern. Regardless, this would seem to indicate that these are the wave of the future in Edmonton, and that the traffic circle is on its way out. Thank goodness.
In the mean time, I must agree with @davetheaxe that clear signs would be beneficial. They should not be at the traffic circle itself, though. Rather, they should be about a block before the circle so that we can change lanes before we get there. Otherwise, we are going to treat them like roundabouts and annoy the heck out of dear old Dave.
Actually, rather than putting up signs, I’d prefer that they just told us to treat traffic circles and roundabouts in the same way. Then we can all get home without feeling the need to send a tweet to yegtraffic. Oh, and let’s stop calling them inside and outside lanes, please. If we all agree that they are left and right lanes there will be no confusion for anyone, except perhaps my roommate who doesn’t always know her right from her left.
I’m glad we got that sorted out. Now, who wants to call that song the Hokey Pokey?
Edit to add:
A family member in the UK has drawn my attention to this “Magic Roundabout” in Swindon. Now I feel as though Edmontonians have nothing to complain about.
This is a timely post. My mother moved to a new neighbourhood surrounded by traffic circles. She hates them and won’t drive through them. 🙂
They seem to work well when there are good lane markings and signs to tell people which lane to be in. Otherwise, they cause a lot of frustration.
Traffic circle? That looks like a traffic labyrinth!
I hate those things. We only have a few and it’s always a friggin free for all.
They seem to work well when everyone knows how to use them. But when they don’t, as you say, it’s a but nuts.